Skip to main content
There was this guy who drove an ice truck.  I don't know his name.  I imagine him sometimes.  I think about one particular morning he woke up to go to work.  His wife probably made him breakfast.  Those were the times, after all.  He dressed and headed out to make his rounds.

This day I'm thinking about, I don't know his specific route or really many specifics at all.  What color was the truck?  How many stops did he make?  Was he early?  Late?  I do know one stop he made.  It was in front of a little house in Lewiston, Maine, in one of the poorer parts of town.  A family lived there.  A mother, a father, four children.  Norton, Gloria, Dicky, Fred.  It was Fred's first birthday.

Dicky, almost four years old, was a daredevil.  He scrambled up onto the ice truck – to snatch chips of ice, I guess.  The driver didn't see him.  So when he backed up, he didn't know that Dicky lurched and fell, and he backed over him, killing him.

The family was devastated.  It still is, really.  It was more than 50 years ago, and the family still feels the effects.  The mother and the father went to a doctor (a general practitioner?  I don't know even that specific), and the doctor told them to go home and make another baby.

So they did.  That baby later grew up and had babies of her own.  I'm one of her children.

I think about the guy who drove the truck.  My entire history hinges on the path he took that day.  If he'd been earlier or later, if he'd been more careful, if he'd had the flu … so many other choices or circumstances, and the chain of events that led to me wouldn't have happened.  And before him, before my grandparents, after them, all the way to yesterday, to today, causality weaves this thick pulsing mass of threads that lead to me and away from me.  I would be paralyzed by the simplest of choices if I let myself think of the ramifications of every decision I make, and yet every decision does impact me and others, sometimes in surprisingly profound ways.  Maybe the effect won't be known until later.  Maybe I will never know the effect.  But it is there, and I must consider it.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This was in the mail: Life’s Too Short To Clean Your Own House. A lovely brochure, featuring a lovely couple, with two lovely blond children, sitting in a lovely family room. The dad is reading a book with one of the daughters. The mom is laughing over a laptop with the other daughter. A pretty picture. Short answer portion of the quiz: 1. Why did the advertising folks choose to put two girls in the picture instead of a girl and a boy? 2. Why did they choose to have the mom pose with the laptop? 3. Who cleans the housecleaners’ houses? Bonus question: are the perky college students pictured on the inside of the brochure real housecleaners or just models?
I have to confess something. I enjoy reading Anne Lamott. Okay, okay, I know that makes me more touchy-feely than I usually admit. She is very lovey. She talks about mystical things. She freely admits to praying (although she uses the F-word frequently in her books about “faith”. I like this in a person.) She talks about breathing. She is very real, and I admire this. She talks about her parents and her son with a mix of love and frustration and grumpiness. She admits, in public, in her writing, to sometimes being angry, sometimes disliking her loved ones, to having to work very hard to forgive them. I like to think I’m like her in a lot of ways, but I don’t share this ability. I can’t easily look at someone I love, look them in the eyes, and say “I’m really angry with you.” “I am mad.” “That was a bad thing you did. To me.” Instead, I’m the sort that says, “Oh, gosh, I’m sure you didn’t mean to run over my dog. It’s okay. I was meaning to get rid of that old thing soo...
Censorship update : According to Em's civics assignment: " Inappropriate news topics will not be accepted. If you are unsure of what is considered appropriate, please consult your teacher or your parents." (The assignment sheet printed that sentence in bold type.) Her entire summary: Source : Washingtonpost.com Headline : House Defeats Gay Marriage Amendment Main Idea : Debating whether or not gay marriages should be banned Summary : People in the House of Representatives debate about banning gay marriage, and it turns out they won't be. :) (Penciled smiley.) Connection : This connects to civics because it has to do with making laws and debating which are big parts of the government. Now, besides the fact that this is a danged sketchy summary and I'd like to throttle her for that, the only opinion she offers is the little smiley. She is brief and matter-of-fact. Practically boring! If anything, the article that she summarized is even ...